The New vs. Old Order of Business

by Jay Deragon on 02/04/2009

The New vs. Old Order of BusinessGood business managers rely on data to shape the companies future strategy.

Data reveals trends, business issues that are critical to stay ahead of competition and market developments.

There is internal data and external data. Actions must be aligned to close the cap or create a gap of performance, customer satisfaction, market developments before your competition does.

As we examine the emergence of the social web we constantly review the market data, the user data and the potential shifts that will or are impacting businesses, people and entire markets.

Lets consider the major developments within the web which are reflected by data. Is it real or hype? The opinions vary based on perspectives, positions and objectives of the viewer but on a macro level the raw data suggest there is something going on worthy of our attention.

  1. Traffic is growing rapidly on a global basis.
  2. People are relying on the web to use as a lifestyle improvement tool.
  3. The social web is creating new dynamics in media, market conversations and influencing transactions.
  4. Media is shifting to where people are spending time, on the web.
  5. The social web is creating a new order of things to come.

The new order of things is being created by individuals using technology, the social web, to connect, create, converse and influence, one to one to millions. The social web represents transformational change of order for businesses globally.

The change of order can be a threat to those inclined to loose the most by not adopting the new order. “There is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things. For the reformer has enemies in all who profit by the old order, and only lukewarm defenders in all who profit by the new order. This lukewarmness arises partly from fear of their adversaries, who have power in their favor, and partly from the incredulity of mankind, who do not believe in anything new until they have had an actual experience of it.” –Machiavelli

The difference today is that the power has and continues to shift from institutions to individuals who when they speak with a common voiInformed consumersce create swarms. The power of swarms is the collective voice and subsequent behavior which gets the attention of the old order.

The problem is the old order of things do not understand the dynamics of the medium which has enabled a power shift. The old discount it, suggest it is just a fad or for the youth. Gartner says Many companies are thinking about how they can take advantage of social-networking technology, but analysts at Gartner are warning against getting caught up in the hype.”

Hype is defined as is a figure of speech in which statements are exaggerated. It may be used to evoke strong feelings or to create a strong impression, and is not meant to be taken literally.

OK, so the data presented in this post is hype? The fact that over 500 million people are engaged in the social web, exchanging ideas, having conversations etc etc. has no meaning for businesses?

Again some of the statements being made from those protecting old models of thought fly in the face of meaningful data which suggest the very opposite of their positional statements. Just maybe the hype is actual in the old statements about the new order of things to come.

In economics, a business is defined as a legally recognized organizational entity existing within an economically free country designed to sell goods and/or services to consumers or other businesses, usually in an effort to generate profit.

Businesses typically try to market themselves with the needs of the customer and position themselves close to where the customers markets are located and active.

Answer a simply question. Should businesses align themselves in activities, conversations and “places” where the customers are engaged spending time and money?

What say you?

{ 2 comments }

Vince Anthony November 12, 2008 at 9:27 pm

fkioow9eed9aon5z

please revise December 17, 2007 at 8:40 am

Hype is defined as is a figure of speech in which statements are exaggerated. It may be used to evoke strong feelings or to create a strong impression, and is not meant to be taken literally.

OK, so the data presented in this post is hype? The fact that over 500 million people are engaged in the social web, exchanging ideas, having conversations etc. has no meaning for businesses?
Again some of the statements being made from those protecting old models of thought fly in the face of meaningful data which suggest the very opposite of their positional statements: Just maybe the hype is actual in the old statements about the new order of things to come.
In economics, a business is defined as a legally recognized organizational entity existing within an economically free country designed to sell goods and/or services to consumers or other businesses, usually in an effort to generate profit.
Businesses typical try to market themselves with the needs of the customer and position themselves close to where the customers markets are located and active.
Answer a simply question. Should businesses align themselves in activities, conversations and “places” where the customers are engaged spending time and money?
What say you?
Next up we will examine real data which defines “where customers are spending time and engaged” by industry and compare the results of business activities in those industries to consumer trends. Will they match up?

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: