{ 11 comments }

Alex Hall February 27, 2010 at 12:57 am

Have a read – Sears: Producer or Conductor? – http://www.relationship-economy.com/?p=8914

JDeragon February 22, 2010 at 6:18 pm

If Sears was a person would you say they are conucting themselves in a social manner?http://is.gd/8VhBJ

JDeragon February 22, 2010 at 4:19 pm

The opposite is a social producer who uses people to create direct benefits to their organization. http://short.to/18dqn

JDeragon February 22, 2010 at 2:18 pm

Does Sears actions & transparent aims reflect an aim to produce for themselves or enables people to reach their aims?http://short.to/18dqn

Gavin from Sendible February 22, 2010 at 12:36 pm

Sears: Producer or Conductor? – http://bit.ly/a7RX6l

topsy_top20k_en February 22, 2010 at 12:19 pm

RelationshipEcon: Sears: Producer or Conductor?: The decision on whether to label Sears as a producer or conductor… http://bit.ly/9FcVEc

JDeragon February 22, 2010 at 12:19 pm

What, if any, is the value proposition or differential that Sears offers people that they can’t get anywhere else?http://short.to/18dqn

Jolt Social Media February 22, 2010 at 12:02 pm

Sears: Producer or Conductor? http://bit.ly/9FcVEc #socialmedia

JDeragon February 22, 2010 at 10:18 am

Why do brands think we are their customers when in fact buyers are not owned by any one brand?http://bit.ly/cc8olv

Brandon Sutton February 22, 2010 at 8:23 am

RT @JDeragon: Why would buyers want to log into yet another community and create content for the benefit of a brand?http://is.gd/8VhBJ

JDeragon February 22, 2010 at 8:18 am

Why would buyers want to log into yet another community and create content for the benefit of a brand?http://is.gd/8VhBJ

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 11 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: