Communes vs. Communities

by Jay Deragon on 08/12/2010

In an earlier post titled “From Communities to Communes” we said ” Finding relevancy to “thinking” is typically found in smaller groups of people who seek knowledge and wisdom that reflects their beliefs. Common beliefs are what creates relational bonds. Haven’t you noticed that your “real” network is actually becoming smaller regardless of how many “followers and friends” you think you have?”

Communities have become a common way for brands, organizations and institutions to accomplish old business models. Old business models applied to use of social technology aimed to attract people into transactional traps by appealing to and creating self interest. Lets admit it. Getting your blog, your content and profile highlighted in one of  major media communities strokes the ego and fulfills the intended self interest, you are important and admired.  The people and organizations that run large communities make money from our content and pay us using the oldest currency in the world, popularity and sense of importance.

Today communities are aggregating people by appealing to the ego currency. What the ego doesn’t see is that the intent of these  models is not for the benefit of the user rather for the primary benefit of the community facilitator, money and power. The community is economically sustained from advertising revenue generated by the “free” contributions of the users.  The users contributions generate traffic which is used to entice relevant advertisers or sponsors who will pay the most to get attention from the audience which is attracted to the community. The “power factor” of communities is relevant to reach and influence. The more readers and influence the greater perceived power. These social media models represent the same old media models just with a different twist. Their use of social technology is aimed at preserving the same old thinking.

The Commune Model

A commune is a natural migration of human dynamics where the membership is designed to have a higher degree of “connectivity” than traditional communities on and off-line. The members of an intentional commune typically hold a common social, political, religious, or spiritual vision and are often part of the alternative society. Sound familiar?

You see the “human network” naturally migrates to communes that hold a common social, political, religious, or spiritual vision. One commune to another may interact as “knowledge inventory” are shared between each commune for the benefit of the whole. “Communes” are only separated by degrees of relational affinities which are maximized by the smallness of the commune vs. large communities which become impossible to hold true relational affinities.

Communes are not sustained by advertising or sponsorship economies rather they become self sustaining due to the what the individuals and collective group creates for each other and other communes.  The  “common purse” represents collective knowledge, group decision-making in general and intellectual affairs that can be applied to creating innovation. These attributes become the “social currency” that is trade-able, valuable and dispersed freely for consumption by individuals and other communes.  The innovation created usually is used to break old paradigms that have locked up “currency trading” by preserving problems rather than facilitating solutions.

Clay Shirky said “The problems of the past are being leveraged by organizations who have created  solutions which preserve the old problems“. The objective of a commune is to create self sustaining solutions that reverses thinking which allows preservation of old problems for economic gains.

How does a commune create a self sustaining economy? Stay tuned for the answer or answer it yourself.


{ 15 comments }

b3buy (Business 3.0 Corp.) August 12, 2010 at 3:05 pm

Twitter Comment


Communes create “social currency” that is trade-able, valuable & freely for consumed by individuals & other communes….[link to post]

Posted using Chat Catcher

ademoor (ademoor) August 12, 2010 at 2:06 pm

Twitter Comment


@JDeragon Don’t agree that communities are self-interested and economically driven [link to post] Only if commercial _pseudo_ commts

Posted using Chat Catcher

Dan Robles August 12, 2010 at 12:42 pm

I am working on a post called Facebookies. The article is very similar to what you describe so well here. By pushing people down, one can exploit their “self-worth” needs while harvesting great social content for free that can then be used to pay salaries for producing and selling crap that holds people down. Look it up – it’s called racketeering.

What we need to do is filter out all the crap. Give people the same tools to exploit marketers as marketers have to exploit people.

holtcomm (Holt Communications) August 12, 2010 at 10:51 am

Twitter Comment


This was interesting Communes vs. Communities [link to post] #socialeconomy

Posted using Chat Catcher

JudithELS (J Christian-Carter) August 12, 2010 at 8:01 am

Twitter Comment


RT @hjarche: Online communities: most are aimed at preserving the same old thinking [link to post] by @JDeragon
Posted using Chat Catcher

audioswhite (Stephen White) August 12, 2010 at 7:47 am

Twitter Comment


communes vs communities: [link to post] by @JDeragon community defs naturally apply to online life. HT @hjarche

Posted using Chat Catcher

sansonnetltd (sansonnetltd) August 12, 2010 at 6:07 am

Twitter Comment


RT @hjarche: Online communities: most are aimed at preserving the same old thinking [link to post] by @JDeragon

Posted using Chat Catcher

hjarche (Harold Jarche) August 12, 2010 at 6:04 am

Twitter Comment


Online communities: most are aimed at preserving the same old thinking [link to post] by @JDeragon

Posted using Chat Catcher

roniyuzirman (Badroni Yuzirman) August 12, 2010 at 6:02 am

Twitter Comment


RT @yuswohady: Utk tmn2 PENGGIAT KOMUNITAS, it’s great article abt brand new concept “COMMUNE” (rather than COMMUNITY) [link to post]

Posted using Chat Catcher

AllThingsM (AllThingsM) August 12, 2010 at 6:02 am

Twitter Comment


Communes vs. Communities [link to post]

Posted using Chat Catcher

AllenatCFM (Allen Howell) August 12, 2010 at 5:34 am

Twitter Comment


RT @JDeragon: Communes vs. Communities ##socialmedia ##socialstrategy ##socialbusiness [link to post]

Posted using Chat Catcher

yuswohady (yuswohady) August 12, 2010 at 5:12 am

Twitter Comment


Utk tmn2 PENGGIAT KOMUNITAS, it’s great article about brand new concept “COMMUNE” (rather than COMMUNITY) [link to post]

Posted using Chat Catcher

AronStevenson (Aron Stevenson) August 12, 2010 at 4:57 am

Twitter Comment


Communes vs. Communities [link to post] #socialmedia

Posted using Chat Catcher

josephgrasso (Joe Grasso) August 12, 2010 at 4:56 am

Twitter Comment


Communes vs. Communities: The objective of a commune is to create self sustaining solutions that preser… [link to post] RT@JDeragon

Posted using Chat Catcher

JDeragon (JDeragon) August 12, 2010 at 4:47 am

Twitter Comment


Think: Communes vs. Communities [link to post] hippie2.0 socialmedia socialstrategy

Posted using Chat Catcher

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 22 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: