Bottom Dwellers of Social Media?

by Jay Deragon on 01/11/2010

This entry is part 22 of 58 in the series Social Strategies

In the world of fishing there are fish called ” bottom dweller”. A bottom dweller is a fish that lives and feeds on the bottom of a body of water.   Typically they eat the debris of other fish and are not fit for human consumption.

Have Brands Become Bottom Dwellers?

Seth Godin writes: The digital world, even the high end brands, has become a sleazy carnival, complete with hawkers, barkers and a bearded lady. By the time someone actually gets to your site, they’ve been conned, popped up, popped under and upsold so many times they really have no choice but to be skeptical.

Basically, it’s a race to the bottom, with so many people spamming trackbacks, planning popups and scheming to trick the surfer with this or that that we’ve bullied people into a corner of believing no one.

Would you befriend someone or an organization that plays tricks on you and steals your time?  Not likely and the thinking behind such designs is considered anti-social and people get irritated and reject such attempts.

A time will come soon when the marketplace will operate differently. Where buyers will simply let the market know what they want and the market will have to come to them rather than buyers having to waste time and money trying to engage with bottom dwellers.  The intention of a buyer is to be served rather than sold. The intention of today’s sellers is to trick us into a transaction or capture us so they can continue to try and trick us over and over.

The purpose of media and technology will change the purpose of sellers. Seller ought to beware that buyers are aware of the old games and have been empowered to change the rules of the game. Our fishing expeditions will catch the marketplace off guard and leaders will win our loyalty by serving our purpose rather than theirs.

To think of social media as merely an extension of old marketing methods is to ignore the preferences of the market. To ignore the preferences of the buyer is the same as saying “we don’t care what buyers want”. Not caring is an attitude that will lose buyers attention…at the click of a mouse.

.

About Jay:
Jay Deragon’s professional career includes providing strategic management consulting services to Fortune 500 companies as well as local small businesses. He has consulted with numerous industries spanning over 25 years of professional experience globally. His current professional endeavors are all centric to the disruptive nature of the social web. He writes at Relationship Economy and provides social media strategic services to businesses large and small. Jay Deragon is an avid student of the emerging landscape of all things social and the subsequent impact on business dynamics. Since 2004 Mr. Deragon has been actively studying, sharing and learning how business as unusual is changing business methods, models and relationships. Life is a journey and the experiences along the way provides learning that furthers the experiences if we know how and what to learn. for more info go here http://www.relationship-economy.com/?page_id=2
Series Navigation«Social Media ROI Comes From IORGet Your “Head” Out of Social!»
[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] Share This Post

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Joe Bob Hester January 11, 2010 at 11:18 am

Thinking of social media as just an extension of old marketing methods ignores market preferences http://bit.ly/5dsMib

JDeragon January 11, 2010 at 11:31 am

You are a bottom dweller is you are trying to rap buyers into a transaction. http://short.to/134ns

Alan See January 11, 2010 at 12:01 pm

RT @JDeragon: You are a bottom dweller is you are trying to rap buyers into a transaction. http://short.to/134ns

Berry Network January 11, 2010 at 12:01 pm

RT @JDeragon: You are a bottom dweller is you are trying to rap buyers into a transaction. http://short.to/134ns

eyalrofe January 11, 2010 at 12:37 pm

The time has come.

JDeragon January 11, 2010 at 12:53 pm

The intention of sellers is to trick us into a transaction or capture us so they can to try and trick us over and over. http://is.gd/5YmsO

eyalrofe January 11, 2010 at 1:08 pm

P.S. Are there any B2C markets in the US that are fully intention based? Who will join them first? why?

David Jacobstein January 11, 2010 at 1:23 pm

Bottom Dwellers of Social Media? http://bit.ly/71hPQy

Business 3.0 Tech. January 11, 2010 at 1:31 pm

Bottom Dwellers of Social Media? http://bit.ly/71hPQy

Ted Vinzani January 11, 2010 at 2:03 pm

RT @gacconsultants: Bottom Dwellers of Social Media? http://bit.ly/71hPQy #relevance #smbixmktg

Mitch aka Misupilami January 12, 2010 at 2:15 am

Bottom Dwellers of Social Media? #socialmedia – http://ow.ly/Vxvi

MediaCluster GmbH January 12, 2010 at 2:15 am

Bottom Dwellers of Social Media? #socialmedia – http://ow.ly/Vxvb

ingenesist January 12, 2010 at 11:54 am

Bottom Dwellers of Social Media? http://bit.ly/71hPQy

dan January 12, 2010 at 12:07 pm

great post Jay,

I have been blogging around this issue too but you say quite clearly here. I am thinking about what the widespread derivative reaction will be like.

Example: The price of Super Bowl Advertising has gone down because the message produced by a company spending 5M per minute overrides the value proposition of their product. We see it in banking, healthcare, automobiles, etc.

Funny thing is that derivatives are not new, they are the very financial instrument that produced the current financial calamity. Further evidence that conversation behaves like a currency.
dan´s last blog ..Draw Your Own Org Chart My ComLuv Profile

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

{ 9 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: