The Social Overton Window

by Jay Deragon on 06/15/2010

This entry is part 16 of 16 in the series The How Series

Social media is causing markets to react to the open discourse about everything, anything, everyone and anyone. It is the open discourse and reactions that create “windows” of public sentiment towards everything.

The Overton window is a concept in political theory, named after its originator, Joseph P. Overton. It describes a “window” in the range of public reactions to ideas in public discourse, in a spectrum of all possible options on a particular issue.

At any given moment the “window” includes a range of discourse acceptable in the current climate of public opinion, with “acceptable” defined as something people can recommend without being considered too “extreme” or outside the mainstream to gain or keep public support.

When the window moves or expands, it means that ideas previously not considered publicly acceptable have become so, and possibly that ideas previously considered acceptable are no longer.

The Social Overton Window

All things social are just beginning to gain mass market acceptance. However the initial acceptance is still at the early stages of understanding of the related dynamics. Ideas and innovative approaches to the use of social technology fuel the intrigue and pull more of the public into the dialog. The degrees of acceptance of the public’s use of social technology  can be described in six behaviors as:

  1. Unthinkable: Some firms do crazy things with social technology that do not fit into the “norm” of public sentiment. Consider some of the things that the young adults have done on MySpace that are “unthinkable” i.e sexually explicit videos and trash talk. Think of some of the stupid things brands have tried using social technology only to create a negative response from the public. On the other end of the spectrum of Unthinkable are those individuals and organizations that do innovative things that no one else even considered, i.e. Pepsi Refresh. The Unthinkable applies to both the good and bad things people and organizations end up doing. Consider Facebook’s attitude towards privacy.
  2. Radical: Social media are creating radical changes in publishing, broadcasting and traditional forms and models of media. Radical uses of social media are marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional tending or disposed to make extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions. Many industries and individual organizations from all business segments are just beginning to feel the impact of just how radical social media can be when they discover what their customers are saying about them
  3. Acceptable: The initial uses of social media have been aimed at marketing and PR. Traditional practices are being applied to the radical nature of social media. What marketing and PR professionals are learning is that what was once an acceptable practice is no longer acceptable. The consumer now defines what is acceptable and is now “connected” to others  with a collective voice.
  4. Sensible: Social media initiatives designed around having, containing, or indicative of good sense or reason. The sentiments of “sensible” are influenced by the human network in response to institutional messages and marketing tactics applied to use of social technologies. While consumers understand the old school marketing methods most are not responsive to these same tactics applied to social media. Subsequently brands that do not understand the relational dynamics of all things social are considered nonsensical. In other words the message has no importance or value to the consumer.
  5. Popular: Messages of or relating to the general public’s interest. If your message doesn’t fit with the market you are trying to reach then you are not likely going to create a “popular” appeal. Consider the unpopular  BP response to the oil spill. Then consider the response generated from a non BP person who started @BPGlobalPR on Twitter and ripped the mask off of BP’s PR Efforts. What was once a “popular” methods for managing public relations, marketing and advertising is now becoming unpopular and new methods are being introduced by the populous.
  6. Standard Practice: When more and more people and organizations do the unthinkable and radical things the more the general public considers such things as acceptable, sensible and popular then ultimately they become standard practice throughout the entire marketplace.

The Social Overton Window is a means of identifying which ideas define that range of acceptance people’s ideas and media fall into. Media is used to  persuade or educate the marketplace so that the window of behavior either “moves” or expands to encompass them. Opponents of changes caused by media, policies and politics seek to convince people that these should be considered unacceptable.

The social sentiment can be moved (the window) by deliberately promoting ideas even less acceptable than the previous “outer fringe” ideas.  The idea is that priming the public with fringe ideas intended to be and remain unacceptable, will make the real target ideas seem more acceptable by comparison. Over time what was once unthinkable becomes standard practices and the cycle continues which fuels even more social changes, good, bad and indifferent.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] Share This Post

{ 34 comments }

A Guide To Learning Google Wave

by Jay Deragon on 11/11/2009

This entry is part 14 of 16 in the series The How Series

Chris Voss shows  you the new Complete Guide To Google Wave. Here is his link to learn more.
Link to Complete Guide To Google Wave.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] Share This Post

{ 27 comments }

Is Your Culture Transparent?

by Jay Deragon on 11/11/2009

This entry is part 13 of 16 in the series The How Series

The “voice” of an organization is indicative of its culture. Organizational culture is an idea in the field of Organizational studies and management which describes the psychology, attitudes, experiences, beliefs and values (personal and cultural values) of an organization. It is defined  as “the specific collection of values and norms  shared by people and groups in an organization and that control the way they interact with each other and with stakeholders outside the organization.”[1]

Notice the definition emphasizes that culture controls the way they interact with each other and with stakeholders outside the organization. Interaction between people is largely enabled by communications. Communications reflected by attitudes, actions and the tone of conversations. Now the attitudes, actions and the tone of conversations has become “open source” fueled by the power of social media. Open source communications show an organizations culture for the world to see and experience.

What Does The World See?

The market of conversations seek value created from an exchange of communications. Values are reflected by relational attributes and the context of content that creates an affinity to a market. The affinity creates an open source culture driven by trust fueled by shared experiences.  The culture of social media is described as the psychology, attitudes, experiences, beliefs and values (personal and cultural values) of people connecting with like-minded “crowds” who offer free value exchanges.  There is no one person or organization trying to control the way they interact with each other.

Social media affords the crowds to interact without the oversight or control of any one organization.  Perplexed by this phenomena traditional organizations jump into social media not realizing that their own culture will become transparent and the market of conversations will expose the character of their culture. If the organizations  culture isn’t “open” then it cannot say trust and value to the market of conversations.  Subsequently the market will not engage because the culture of social media rejects any attempt to control or manipulate the conversations.

Magnifying The Need For Change

Organizational cultural change has evolved for decades. Studies after studies prove the value of an “open vs. closed” culture and evidence abounds from those organizations who have made the shift. Awareness of an organizations cultural attributes are  communications. People share their experiences with other people. People are the power of any organization and unless  empowered they will feel powerless.

Empowered people represent enormous power. Unified for a cause, a mission or a common goal people can and will do uncommon things. Uncommon things are about achievement of the impossible, unexpected and not planned but realized. On the fringes of uncommon things is innovation. Innovations comes from creating ideas that solve common problems and then creates new solutions that serve a market.

Social media affords the means for people to unite and exchange ideas, knowledge and creates solutions for the “crowds”. For any business to succeed they will need to learn and understand why this happens, how it happens and who makes it happen. Doing so is the solution to create innovation which markets will consume and  create new capital.  However unless business leaders can first change their own culture they cannot tap into the “open source” culture of social media. Attempting to do so without fixing their own culture is a direct path to failure. Get it?

What say you?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] Share This Post

{ 25 comments }

Why Do You Use Social Media?

by Jay Deragon on 10/15/2009

This entry is part 11 of 16 in the series The How Series

My six year old ask a lot of questions. Most questions start with “Why?”. The reason children ask why a lot is because their minds are geared to learn why things are the way they are and why people do the things they do.

A lesson we can all  learn from the minds of children is that asking why is a good question to ask about anything and eveything. However the older we get, the more educated and the higher position we have in a company we assume we know the “why’s” about a lot of things and in reality we really don’t know why but we pretend we do.

When I look at how brands and people use social media it becomes obvious that they never have asked them selves why before they started using social media.  How can I tell this? Because what they use it for and how they use it isn’t connected to why people use it.

We must understand why people use social media so we can better define why we, as individuals and organization, should be using it.

Why Do We Communicate?

In an earlier post titled “Again, What Is Social Media?” we said that fundamentally social media is a system of communications. The process of social media involves:

  1. Use Of Technology
  2. Identifying and providing valuable conversations
  3. Distribution of conversations to appropriate and relevant markets
  4. Methods and messages that create pull an engagement
  5. Building and sustaining an audience (relationships) of listeners
  6. Continually feeding the audience with conversational currency; value they can use

Now if you agree with our definition of what social media is and the process of use then the answer to “why” is relevant to thinking about why and what you communicate to the market of conversations. However to determine why you or your organization should use social media it is best to understand why others do first.

So Why Do Others Use Social Media?

I am a consummate student of social media. I call myself a student because my primary motivation for using social media is to learn how “the market” is using it and what methods create what results and why.

The word study means : a state of contemplation : application of the mental faculties to the acquisition of knowledge : a careful examination or analysis of a phenomenon, development, or question. Notice the last word in the definition, question. If you haven’t noticed 99% of my post start out with a question and the reason is I am seeking to know why. I learn why based on what others do and what the system is meant or enable us to do.

People and organizations are producing varied results from use of social media. As you can imagine there are numerous methods being used and because most view social media as just another marketing channel they are getting the same results as other marketing methods, terrible.

When you study why, what and how the crowd of sincere “people”, not institutions, are using social media you’ll find different methods and different results.  What I’ve noticed about this group is that the primary reason why they use social media is centric to learning or in other words the acquisition of knowledge. Whether it is learning about new tools and the application of use or simply answering questions about anything, everything and anyone people find utility in learning from others.

The results from learning are much different than marketing. Learning pulls people which enables and enhances relationships. Marketing pushes people and is not centric to relationship building.

Learning has always been and will always be a powerful force that draws people.  Whether an individual or organization the answer to why leads to another question. What can you communicate that enables people to learn something of value they can use and share with others how they used it? In order to find out why you must listen to the markets needs and wants. Your response to the wants and needs may not have anything to do with your own product or service but it has everything to do with building market relations. The results of doing so will surprise you. Get it?

What say you?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] Share This Post

{ 20 comments }

How Do You Learn How?

by Jay Deragon on 10/03/2009

This entry is part 8 of 16 in the series The How Series

While everyone seems to be rushing into using social media for whatever purpose the constant question people ask is “How” to create something with it.  Subsequently there are thousands of people “pushing” out advertising messages claiming they “know how”.

Since the market is still very immature individuals and organizations jump into the process following, and in most cases, copying “how” others are using it.  Here is the problem with copying. It doesn’t produce anymore than others have already produced.

What Are Others Producing?

I’ve done a simple analysis of “how” the bulk of the market is using social media. This study is based on an assessment of 8,000 followers on Twitter, over 10,000 connections on Linkedin and Facebook and a sampling of brands who have engaged in this process we call “social media”. Here are my findings:

  1. 94% are using social media to “push out” old messages trying to catch someone in a transaction
  2. 95% of the brands are simply using social media to “push” out their offerings, sales and marketing messages with little if any human interaction.
  3. Of over 8,000 followers on Twitter 96% of the communications have no relevancy to anything relative that would “pull” a market to them for whatever purpose.
  4. Of 50 groups I am a member of on Linkedin 95% of the group discussions do not represent new knowledge, new insights on new methods and more specifically “how” to create innovation and differential using social technology.
  5. 100% of the offerings I found proclaiming “how” to use social media effectively were in context to use of the technology not “how” to engage and build an audience that “sticks” and leads to “convertising”.

So with this data I asked myself “how” do people and institutions learn “how” to create new value, conversational currency and ultimately new transactions that motivate others to share why the new value created is better.

Where Can We Find “How”?

To properly answer this question we have to ask another question. The question is “what person or organization has captured “how” to do anything better and where did they find the knowledge to do so?” Now take a minute and think about “how” you would answer this question.

The first part of the question “what person or organization has captured “how” to do anything better than what the current market produced?” The answer leads us to recall industry leaders who have created new markets with innovative products and services. How did they do this? With the knowledge that lies between their ears and the input from people who believed in their vision of what could be done but wasn’t currently being done and if done would satisfy a market yet in demand.

The second part of the question “where did they find the knowledge to do so?” The answer is that these people didn’t find the knowledge to do so rather they created it. What? Yes, they created new knowledge which lead to new innovation in products and services that filled a market demand that their application of the new knowledge created.

Back To The Question Of “How?”

“How” to use anything effectively comes from learning what is currently working and why then applying creativity and knowledge aimed at how to make things work better than the current methods. Learning what is currently working is readily available for those willing to read and listen to those using the current methods for whatever purpose. Applying creativity and knowledge to make things work better than the current methods cannot be copied or found because it doesn’t exist until somebody creates it and uses it to produce better results than what the current market produces.

So how do we learn “how”? We can create it or copy it. Which produces the results you want?

What say you?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] Share This Post

{ 25 comments }

Where Do You Find “How”?

by Jay Deragon on 10/02/2009

This entry is part 7 of 16 in the series The How Series

When you want to find something most people use search.  The results are always relevant to what you typed in for words that reflect what you are looking for. When you type in “how to use social media” you get 239,000,000 references. This many references is indicative of how many papers, people, videos and post have been written on the subject of “how”. The problem is that most of this content says the same thing.

How is always in demand especially when things are in a constant state of change. Change disrupts how old things are done and forces us to learn how things are done now. The problem with social media is that now things change constantly at the click of a mouse. So the question remains “Where do you find how?”

When you look up the word how in the dictionary it provides the following definitions:

  1. In what manner or way; by what means: 
  2. In what state or condition:
  3. To what extent, amount, or degree:
  4. For what reason or purpose; why:
  5. With what meaning:
  6. By what name:
  7. By what measure; in what units:

Now these are words to define the word “how” but the relevant definition is to know “how” to apply knowledge to something so in doing so it creates more value than the previous state or condition.

As previously discussed social media is a communications system which enables that which you communicate to attract an audience based on the value of what you communicate. The system has massive reach and efficiency over the old system if you know “how” to use it effectively. The system has real time statistics that can be used to verify whether your communications and what you were communicating was effective.

The problem with this new system is that there are no manuals to reference the needed knowledge to understand it in its entirety rather the knowledge rest in the minds of those using it regularly and creating the most value.

Finding those who use it and finding those who use it effectively can be somewhat of a challenge. The first challenge is finding a reference point to that which you seek and finding the right answer or right person can be a daunting task.

Many are able to show you how the technology works. Few are able to provide you with the knowledge of why and how people use the technology for specific business objectives.  The irony is you can find “how” by using the technology to find the knowledge and the people behind it. However, most of what you’ll find is people copying methods of others which in turn will produce the same results as others. Consider that 98% of those using it aren’t producing relative and relevant results because they don’t know how. Get it?

What say you

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon] Share This Post

{ 14 comments }